You are here: Home > News >United Church News > Iraq war debate puts many pastors in tough position

Links

> Minister & President's message on Peace

> Statement of UCC leaders opposing War in Iraq

 

> 20 Ways to Stop War with Iraq - UCC Resource

> A Resolution Concerning our Government's Response to the Attacks of 9/11/01, passed by the Massachusetts Conference Annual Meeting; June, 2002

> National Council of Churches Web site

> Comment on this article through our Discussion Forum

Iraq war debate puts many pastors in tough position

November, 2002

 

By Tiffany Vail

When Elizabeth Waters decided to preach against a possible U.S. military strike against Iraq, she knew that many of her parishioners would not agree with her stand. But she didn’t fully foresee the response she would get.

Many of the people who normally would wait in line after the service to shake her hand didn’t. Others came, but would not meet her eyes. No one praised her for the sermon. Only one person even acknowledged what she had said, responding: “that was a strong statement.”

“This is the farthest out I’ve ever gone, but there is no question I had to do this,” said Waters, pastor of the United Church in Pelham. “My goal is not to convince them, it is to make a stand and have them consider it.”

Waters was careful in how she framed her message, stating “I do not mean to claim religious authority at being absolutely right in my position or that you should believe what I believe … Because we are a covenantal church, we are asked to take seriously other people’s points of view. To listen and consider them.”

How to respond to President George W. Bush’s push for the use of military force in Iraq is causing divide across the United Church of Christ. A statement opposing the war released by the national collegium of officers, and signed by 30 Conference ministers, has been debated and criticized on Discussion Forums at www.ucc.org. A resolution opposing the expansion of the war on terrorism beyond Afghanistan brought lengthy debate at the Massachusetts Conference’s Annual Meeting in June – and passed by a 70 to 30 percent vote.

Clergy are responding to the opposing opinions in a variety of ways. Some, like Waters, have decided to preach on it. Others have not been as direct.

Jeffrey Larsen, pastor of the Congregational Church in South Dartmouth, remembers churches splitting over the Vietnam issue. He doesn’t want to see the same thing happen now.

“I remember at the time that these issues were very divisive. It became such a split that neither side was talking or listening to one another. I believe its possible to do something a little different this time,” he said.

So Larsen recently invited people who wanted to talk about the issue to stay after worship and share their feelings. About 20 people came.

“The conversation had the potential to get heated at several points, but I would remind people that we were there to hear each other, and to listen with respect,” he said. “At the end, the only decision made was that we need to have more dialogue sessions.”

Larsen said he intentionally did not state his own views before the gathering, although he planned to in the near future.

“I really wanted them to feel free to share their opinions and not be in the spot of countering me,” he said.

Don Remick, pastor of the First Church in Hanover, has taken a similar approach, choosing to encourage dialogue without divulging his own feelings.
On a recent Sunday, he preached on the history of separation of church and state, and discussed the tradition of Christians being involved in public issues.
He invited people to stay and share their thoughts and feelings about Iraq after worship that day. About a dozen people came.

“The folks who came said that while they had opportunities to talk one on one about the issue, they had not had a chance to reflect on it as a part of a community,” he said. “When you’re in the church, and you end with prayer, that lends a different atmosphere.”

“I tried to be a facilitator,” he said. “At that gathering we advocated advocacy, but not a particular opinion. We said that if you faithfully feel called to make a statement, then please be in touch with your representatives.”
Some pastors have chosen to make their views known – but not from the pulpit.

Martha Woodworth Whitehead, pastor of the Trinity Church in Gloucester, took part in an anti-war protest outside a GOP fundraiser attended by President Bush. She was quoted in a Boston Herald article about the event. But in an effort not to put her parishioners on the defensive, she has not preached specifically against the war from the pulpit.

“I have preached that peace is a byproduct of strength, not weakness,” she said “I don’t want to be in anyone’s face. I’d rather broach the subject gently. Let them come to their own conclusions over the dinner table, or talking to me in my study, or at Bible study.”

Some clergy have not only found themselves at odds with their congregations over the issue; some have found themselves in disagreement with one another as well.

At a recent gathering of Berkshire Association clergy, someone suggested that the group issue a statement opposing the war. Some wanted to act quickly; others wanted time to discuss the issue thoroughly. Some did not want to be put on the spot or to force one another to choose sides.

“Clergy are really feeling pressured and uptight and unclear on what they should and shouldn’t be doing,” said John Wightman, a retired pastor who moderated the Berkshire gathering and attended a similar interfaith gathering where the same discussion took place.

“A lot feel caught between what they perceive to be the attitude of the denomination – most of their respective national bodies are generally opposed to the war – and the real misgivings they encounter about that position when they talk to people in their churches,” he said.

Like Larsen, the conversations about Iraq bring Wightman back to the days of the Vietnam War, when he was a minister who actively protested the war even as his conservative parishioners, especially in the early years, supported it.
“Those were not happy years for me,” he said. “How could I be true to my own convictions – the war, simply, was wrong – and at the same time minister to the emotional and spiritual needs of my congregation?”

Wightman did the best balancing act he could, and said today’s pastors will have to do the same.

“Our pastors are in the trenches on this one as they try to be clear with their convictions at the same time as they try to support the people entrusted to their care,” he said. “They need our support and prayers.”

Return to United Church News front page

Return to Massachusetts Conference home page